Profile 04 · Nutrition, probiotics and functional foods
You need publishable technical evidence that withstands a regulatory adviser's review.
The distance between technical evidence and a product claim decides whether a study serves the company or exposes it.
What cannot be solved today
The study never gets published.
The analysis was done, but the package does not answer what a journal requires or what a reviewer asks.
The academic partner distrusts the in-house analysis.
Without declared provenance, the collaboration starts by arguing about the method instead of the biology.
The regulatory team blocks use of the result.
A result without written limits is a liability before it is an asset.
What we deliver
Paired change with sensitivity already computed
Diversity, before-and-after comparisons and differential abundance with ANCOM-BC2 under a registered specification. Networks are declared not available until the cohort supports them.
An explicit separation between evidence and claim
The report states what was measured and what it does not authorise you to claim. That boundary is the deliverable, not an appendix.
A package a third party can rerun
The academic partner or the reviewer checks the result without depending on your in-house team.
Available Computed today on public microbiome data. In genomics, the public demonstration uses synthetic annotation; real sources are agreed by contract.
The proof, checkable now
60
verifiable synthetic samples
Each row in metadata.tsv describes a generated sample. These are not human participants or clinical observations.
- Dataset
- nexalel-review-challenge.1729
- Method version
- Snakemake · microbiome-counts-analysis 1.0.0
- Run identifier
- Frozen example · verifiable scientific fingerprint
- Artifact hash
- 49a756dd4b79182add9b147727cc4781775a905f4e2473eb03b6ccdef077ab9e
- Seed
- 1729
The check runs in your browser and confirms file integrity. It does not replace scientific review or a fresh run.
What held up
A diversity signal holds under the documented depth check.
What did not hold up
Of the two significant contrasts, neither survived the sensitivity test. We publish that too.
We publish both. A method that only shows its successes cannot be evaluated.
Download the synthetic tables and test the analysis ↓ · 0.01 MB · No account, no form and no sales call.
Questions your procurement team will ask
Can it support a health claim?
No. We deliver technical research evidence, and any product claim rests with your regulatory team.
Do you work with shotgun data?
The public, verified workflow is 16S amplicon. For shotgun, scope is defined before any commitment.
Can we publish the result?
That is what the format is for. The package is designed to accompany a journal submission.
Who is listed as an author?
Agreed in writing before we start. We are analysis providers, not co-authors by default.
What does your next study have to demonstrate?
We first agree on the question, the assay, the data rights and the deliverable. Then we decide whether working together makes sense.