Job 03 · Substantiate
A package that answers what the committee, the reviewer and the funder will ask.
The report separates what was measured, what was inferred and what was interpreted. Each layer states what supports it.
The result
A report that connects each conclusion to its evidence and its limits.
A report that separates observation, inference and interpretation, with the intended use stated in writing.
Available The format is published and can be downloaded from the public microbiome case.
What is included
Three layers kept apart
Observation, inference and interpretation are never mixed in the same sentence. Each declares its own uncertainty.
The intended use in writing
The document states that it is research. That protects your team and defines what cannot be claimed with it.
What did not hold up
Results that fail the criteria appear in the same report, at the same level of detail.
Snakemake · microbiome-counts-analysis 1.0.0 · Synthetic labels · OLS on CLR · BH · seed 1729
The proof, checkable now
60
verifiable synthetic samples
Each row in metadata.tsv describes a generated sample. These are not human participants or clinical observations.
- Dataset
- nexalel-review-challenge.1729
- Method version
- Snakemake · microbiome-counts-analysis 1.0.0
- Run identifier
- Frozen example · verifiable scientific fingerprint
- Artifact hash
- 49a756dd4b79182add9b147727cc4781775a905f4e2473eb03b6ccdef077ab9e
- Seed
- 1729
The check runs in your browser and confirms file integrity. It does not replace scientific review or a fresh run.
What held up
A diversity signal holds under the documented depth check.
What did not hold up
Of the two significant contrasts, neither survived the sensitivity test. We publish that too.
We publish both. A method that only shows its successes cannot be evaluated.
Download the synthetic tables and test the analysis ↓ · 0.01 MB · No account, no form and no sales call.
What does your next study have to demonstrate?
We first agree on the question, the assay, the data rights and the deliverable. Then we decide whether working together makes sense.